This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
"δ", a latent variable constructed from cognitive performance and functional status measures, can accurately diagnose dementia. The minimal assessment needed is unknown. We have constructed a δ homolog, "dTEXAS", from Telephone Executive Assessment Scale (TEXAS) items, and validated it in a convenience sample of Japanese persons (n = 176). dTEXAS scores correlated strongly with both Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (r = -0.86, p < 0.001) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) (r = 0.71, p < 0.001). Constructed independently of their diagnoses, dTEXAS scores accurately distinguished dementia versus controls (area under the receiver operating curve [(AUC; ROC) = 0.92], dementia versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (AUC = 0.80) and controls versus MCI (AUC = 0.74). These AUCs are higher than those of multiple observed executive measures, as reported recently by Matsuoka et al., 2014. A dTEXAS score of -0.58 best discriminated between dementia versus controls with 90.1% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Royall et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: