Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are means of summarizing and synthesizing research evidence in a given topic area. They can be used to define the current state of knowledge and how confident we can be in that knowledge, to identify evidence gaps, and to provide recommendations for policy and practice based on the best available evidence. At European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, our editorial stance is explicitly to encourage the conduct of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The purpose of this editorial is to provide some guidance to authors and journal referees on the (technical) features of good systematic reviews.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin Daniels (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: