BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a common musculoskeletal disease with significant complications that can become a global public health problem and a major cause of death and morbidity. AIM: The present study aimed to determine the effect of pulsed magnetotherapy, aerobic exercise, and a combination of both methods on postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The randomized clinical trial included 45 patients with osteoporosis aged 60 to 65 years who had menopause at least 6 months ago and had been sedentary for at least 6 months. Patients were randomly divided into 3 equal groups. Group A (magnetic therapy group): received standard treatment (bisphosphonates, calcium and vitamin D) in addition to pulsed magnetic therapy in the hip area for 12 weeks (3 sessions per week). Group B (exercise group): received conventional treatment plus moderate-intensity aerobic exercise for 12 weeks (3 sessions per week). Group C (combined magnetic therapy and exercise therapy group): received standard medical treatment plus pulsed magnetic therapy and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise for 12 weeks (3 sessions per week). Bone mineral density was assessed in three groups at baseline by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The results showed that intragroup analysis revealed a statistically significant increase (p 0.05) in bone mineral density in the 3 study groups. Comparison of the results among the 3 tested groups revealed a significant increase (p 0.05) in mean post-test bone mineral density values in group C compared to group A and group B. There was no significant statistical difference in mean bone mineral density between the two groups A and B after testing. CONCLUSION: The combination of pulsed magnetotherapy and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise showed a significant improvement in hip bone mineral density compared with either method alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byalovsky et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: