Examines a novel male-killing mechanism in butterflies, suggesting evolution within hosts.
Male-killing bacterial symbionts, prevalent in arthropods, skew population sex ratios by selectively killing male progeny, profoundly impacting ecology and evolution of their hosts. Male-killing is a convergently evolved trait, with microbes evolving diverse male-killing mechanisms across host species with widely divergent sex determination pathways. A common evolutionary response to MK presence is the spread of suppressor mutations that restore male survival. In this study, we demonstrate evolution of a novel male-killing mechanism that is insensitive to an existing male-killing suppressor. Hypolimnas bolina butterflies from Yogyakarta, Indonesia, showed extreme female biased population sex ratio associated with high prevalence of a male-killing Wolbachia . This strain, w Bol1Y, shared a very recent common ancestor with the previously characterized ‘suppressed’ male-killing strain in the species, w Bol1, but retained its male-killing ability in the presence of the male-killing suppressor. The genome of w Bol1Y differed from the suppressed w Bol1 in carrying an additional prophage that included strong candidate genes for male-killing. In vitro and in vivo data demonstrated that w Bol1Y feminized splicing and expression of lepidopteran sex determination pathway genes, and that the gene Hb-oscar – present on w Bol1Y’s unique prophage insert – was sufficient to disrupt the male sex determination pathway. Our study demonstrates the diversity of male-killing mechanisms is a product both of interaction with varying insect sex determination systems and evolution of male-killing within a host species. Our data indicate male-killer and host may be involved in escalating arms races, where spread male-killing suppression drives evolution of additional systems that reestablish male killing by the symbiont.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: