Why the study?
Patients with ACS face significant morbidity and mortality, prompting an evaluation of evolving ACS care practice patterns in Taiwan.
How have practice patterns and quality of care for ACS patients undergoing PCI in Taiwan changed between 2008-2010 and 2012-2015?
How have practice patterns and quality of care for ACS patients undergoing PCI in Taiwan changed between 2008-2010 and 2012-2015?
ACS care quality in Taiwan improved from 2008 to 2015, particularly with reduced STEMI door-to-balloon times, though onset-to-door times and secondary prevention medication use remain areas for improvement.
ACS care quality improved in Taiwan between registries; leaves open links to clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS have a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the practice patterns of ACS care in Taiwan from 2005 to 2018. METHODS: Data from two nationwide ACS registries (2008-2010 and 2012-2015) were used. ACS patients who received percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) during admission were compared between the two registries. RESULTS: In STEMI, the door-to-balloon time for primary PCI decreased by 25 min from a median of 96 to 71 min (p < 0.0001) from the first to second registry. More complex PCI procedures and drug-eluting stents were used for ACS. However, the onset-to-door time was still long for both STEMI and NSTE-ACS. The D2B time for NSTE-ACS was long, especially in the elderly and female patients. Although the prescription rate of secondary preventive medications for ACS increased, it was still relatively low compared with Western data, especially in NSTE-ACS. CONCLUSIONS: The registry data showed that ACS care quality has improved in Taiwan. However, areas including onset-to-door time and use of secondary preventive medications still need further improvements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: