Why the study?
Does 4-dimensional arthrography with motion-gated multislice computed tomography accurately assess the kinesis and morphology of the acetabular labrum compared to arthroscopy in symptomatic patients?
Does 4-dimensional arthrography with motion-gated multislice computed tomography accurately assess the kinesis and morphology of the acetabular labrum compared to arthroscopy in symptomatic patients?
4-dimensional arthrography with motion-gated multislice CT is a useful noninvasive tool for evaluating the kinematics and morphology of the acetabular labrum.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive stratification of acetabular labrum motion in symptomatic patients; leaves open prospective validation versus arthroscopy.
To analyze the kinesis and morphology of the acetabular labrum (AL) noninvasively, we applied 4-dimensional arthrography with motion-gated multislice computed tomography and compared the results with arthroscopy and Harris hip score (HHS) in 49 symptomatic patients who performed reciprocating hip flexion-extension as we carried out mimic retrospective electrocardiogram-gating acquisition. The kinematics and morphology of AL were classified as stabilized, irregular, or eccentric motion patterns. Of the 9 subjects who had intact or frayed AL on arthroscopy, 7 had stabilized motion (average 50 HHS) and 2 had irregular (44 HHS) motion by CT arthroscopy. Of the 16 without adhesive AL on arthroscopy, 6 had irregular motion (48 HHS) and 4 had eccentric motion (58 HHS). We found that the 4-dimensional arthrography with motion-gated multislice computed tomography can reveal both kinetic and morphological changes of the AL, and facilitate further stratification in subjects with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons class 0, or 1 or without "detached" morphological findings by arthroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kishida et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: