In the first part of this article, we describe the projective representations in the category of representations by modules of a quiver which does not contain any cycles and the quiver A ∞ as a subquiver, that is, the so-called rooted quivers. As a consequence of this, we show when the category of representations by modules of a quiver admits projective covers. In the second part, we develop a technique involving matrix computations for the quiver A ∞, which will allow us to characterize the projective representations of A ∞. This will improve some previous results and make more accurate the statement made in Benson (1991). We think this technique can be applied in many other general situations to provide information about the decomposition of a projective module.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enochs et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: