A common use of the word 'space' refers to it as a container of things, commonly so in cartography as well as other spatial disciplines. According to this way of thinking, space contains phenomena; we live in it, and we move through it. This notion has carried over into fundamental theories of various scientific fields such as spatial cognition, geography and some engineering disciplines. Even though the conceptualization of space as a container makes intuitive sense at first, space cannot be defined as a container without a reference frame, and a reference frame cannot be defined without space. To avoid this circular logic, in this paper, we argue that the concept of space can be defined with respect to our experience of signal variation, just like anything else. This line of thinking suggests that everything is spatial because space is an abstraction of all other experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thrash et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: