Why the study?
Cerebrovascular events after TAVR are difficult to predict due to a multifactorial origin incompletely explained by clinical predictors.
Can a deep learning-based predictive model using clinical and imaging characteristics accurately predict 30-day cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing TAVR?
Can a deep learning-based predictive model using clinical and imaging characteristics accurately predict 30-day cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing TAVR?
A deep learning-based algorithm integrating clinical and imaging variables can predict 30-day cerebrovascular events after TAVR with good discrimination (AUC 0.79).
Background Cerebrovascular events (CVE) are one of the most feared complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). CVE appear difficult to predict due to their multifactorial origin incompletely explained by clinical predictors. We aimed to build a deep learning-based predictive tool for TAVR-related CVE. Methods Integrated clinical and imaging characteristics from consecutive patients enrolled into a prospective TAVR registry were analysed. CVE comprised any strokes and transient ischemic attacks. Predictive variables were selected by recursive feature reduction to train an autoencoder predictive model. Area under the curve (AUC) represented the model’s performance to predict 30-day CVE. Results Among 2,279 patients included between 2007 and 2019, both clinical and imaging data were available in 1,492 patients. Median age was 83 years and STS score was 4.6%. Acute (<24 hours) and subacute (day 2-30) CVE occurred in 19 (1.3%) and 36 (2.4%) patients, respectively. The occurrence of CVE was associated with an increased risk of death (HR [95%CI]: 2.62 [1.82-3.78]). The constructed predictive model uses less than 107 clinical and imaging variables and has an AUC of 0.79 (0.65-0.93). Conclusions TAVR-related CVE can be estimated using a deep learning-based predictive algorithm. The model was implemented online for broad usage. ( https://www.welcome.alviss.ai/#/cvecalculator ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okuno et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: