Why the study?
Does UPLC-MS/MS analysis of leukocyte cardiolipin accurately diagnose Barth syndrome?
Does UPLC-MS/MS analysis of leukocyte cardiolipin accurately diagnose Barth syndrome?
A novel UPLC-MS/MS method for leukocyte cardiolipin analysis offers a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test for Barth syndrome that can be integrated into routine clinical biochemistry.
May aid Barth syndrome diagnosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before routine use.
Barth syndrome (BTHS) is an X-linked disorder characterised by cardiomyopathy, skeletal myopathy, growth retardation, neutropenia and 3-methylglutaconic aciduria. It is caused by mutations in the TAZ gene which codes for tafazzin, a protein with acyl transferase activity involved in synthesis of cardiolipin. Monolysocardiolipin (MLCL) is an intermediate in this process. Diagnosis of BTHS is difficult, as clinical and biochemical features are variable and numerous TAZ mutations have been described. These factors, together with lack of a straightforward diagnostic test are thought to have contributed to under-diagnosis of the condition. A novel method for cardiolipin analysis by reversed-phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) is reported which is less complicated and faster than previously described methods and uses a readily available sample type. The equipment, reagents and expertise required are found in most clinical laboratories performing metabolic investigations. Leukocytes were prepared from whole blood, phospholipids extracted and tetralinoleyl cardiolipin (CL4) and MLCL analysed by UPLC-MS/MS. Reference values were derived from analysis of 76 control and 23 BTHS samples as follows: CL4 in controls >132 (95 % CI 100-169), BTHS <30.2 (21.3-40.4) pmol/mg protein; MLCL/CL4 ratio in controls <0.006 (0.004-0.009) and >2.52 (1.51-4.22) in BTHS patients. We describe an improved method for CL4 and MLCL/CL4 analysis which can be incorporated into the routine work of a clinical biochemistry laboratory. It shows 100 % sensitivity and specificity for BTHS, making it a suitable diagnostic test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowron et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: