Unifies ontological concepts and proposes frameworks for empirical validation in dialogue with physics and AI.
This paper unifies, rewrites, and substantially expands—in a formal academic style—a set of ontological propositions from the Theory of Objectivity (TO) con- cerning: (i) boundary lines as conditions of individuation and coherence among elements (with emphasis on atomic architecture and the nucleus–electron separa- tion); (ii) nuclear cohesion and the hypothesis of defragmentation into tertiary plasma; (iii) gravity as a logical expression of convergence zones and couplings to a universal plasma; (iv) plasma as “space itself” (an ontological substrate) and, simultaneously, as a measurable physical state; and (v) electricity, magnetism, elec- tromagnetism, sound, and Light as phenomenic elements (emergent presentations arising from interactions among plasma, atomic units, and radiation). Methodolog- ically, we employ an explicitly bicameral framework: Chamber A formalizes TO as a modal-ontological grammar and introduces a phenomenic table built on three primary elements (plasma, atomic units, and radiation) and seven convergent non- empty subsets; Chamber B fixes physical-quantitative regimes, observables, and non-negotiable consistency floors (Maxwellian electrodynamics, plasma physics, QCD/EFT, general relativity, and observational cosmology). The central contri- bution is a program of operational bridges audited under PASS/HOLD gates, structured with AI-assisted methodological scrutiny, requiring differential predic- tion and explicit failure conditions for any claim of empirical contact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vidamor Cabannas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: