This work argues a unified structural argument spanning five magnitudes, suggesting coherence as a core test in philosophy.
The One Argument at Five Scales argues that five independently developed essays within the Gaitan Topology are not separate conclusions but one structural argument expressed across five magnitudes: the micro-gap of human freedom, the life of the person, the species, the cosmos, and the inner life of God. Rather than introducing a new premise, the essay demonstrates the architectural unity of the corpus, showing that the same invariant relation between the created Now and its Non-derivative ground survives every increase in scale. The work proposes that coherence across magnitudes is the proper methodological test for structural philosophy and presents the completed framework as a unified metaphysical architecture rather than a collection of independent investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oscar Gaitan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: