Why the study?
Standardizing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring results and linking data to post-surgical outcomes remains difficult, while randomized trials face ethical issues.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper proposes a quasi-experimental design for investigating Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring to address ethical issues preventing randomized controlled trials.
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring evaluates nervous system responses during surgery and classifies data as normal or abnormal. However it has been difficult to standardize Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring results and to link intraoperative data to post-surgical outcomes, with alert criteria and concepts that contrast through laboratories and guidelines. Clinical Randomized Trials have not been applied for investigation because of ethical issues, but still more investigation is needed. Neuroethics and Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring are related because the latter encompass patient’s post-surgical outcome and life quality. In this paper investigation methods proposed for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring are reviewed with consequent opinions. Moreover a quasi-experimental design for investigation is proposed, which is closer to Neuroethics and patients wellbeing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raúl Roberto Valdés Sedeño (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: