Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines mass-deformed bosonic matrix quantum mechanics, revealing phase structure implications.
We study the large–[Formula: see text] dynamics of the mass–deformed bosonic [Formula: see text] matrix quantum mechanics using a Hubbard–Stratonovich localization of the Yang–Mills interaction. After integrating out the matrix coordinates, the theory reduces to a holonomy–dependent effective action for an auxiliary adjoint kernel. We introduce a commuting–symmetric saddle and its maximally symmetric specialization, in which the interaction is encoded in a single dynamically generated mass shift [Formula: see text]. The resulting large–[Formula: see text] description is a gauged matrix harmonic oscillator with self–consistent frequency [Formula: see text], fixed by a gap equation. We analyze the low–temperature [Formula: see text]-space physics, the holonomy effective action, the Yang–Mills observable, and the associated phase structure. We then identify a correlated double–scaling limit in which [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] is held fixed. In this limit the Yang–Mills interaction and the explicit mass deformation remain parametrically balanced: the theory interpolates between the commutator–dominated BFSS regime and the mass–dominated Gaussian regime. The double–scaled theory exhibits two complementary large–[Formula: see text] regimes. At low temperature, the enhanced gap pushes the deconfinement scale upward and opens a parametrically large uniform–holonomy region, where the bulk dynamics behaves as weakly coupled [Formula: see text]–type gauged harmonic–oscillator sectors. At the same time, the high–temperature branch reveals an overlap window in which the Gaussian description remains self–consistent while the commutator contribution per matrix pair is parametrically suppressed. The resulting dynamics is therefore [Formula: see text]–like in its enlarged uniform–holonomy sector and IKKT–like in its almost–commuting matrix behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badis Ydri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: