Key result
Study evaluates SMuRF burden across SPECT perfusion categories but reports no clinical outcome data.
Why the study?
Whether standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factor burden provides incremental prognostic value across SPECT perfusion categories remains unclear.
Does standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factor (SMuRF) burden provide incremental prognostic value across SPECT perfusion categories in patients without prior CAD?
Observational (n=38,917)
No
Does standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factor (SMuRF) burden provide incremental prognostic value across SPECT perfusion categories in patients without prior CAD?
Retrospective trial examines the impact of modifiable risk factors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients evaluated via SPECT imaging.
Stress myocardial perfusion imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is widely used for evaluating coronary artery disease (CAD), with total perfusion deficit (TPD) serving as a validated, automated quantitative predictor of cardiovascular events.1 Recently, attention has focused on the concept of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs): hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and smoking, as prognostic determinants in patients with acute coronary syndrome.2 However, whether SMuRF burden provides incremental prognostic value across SPECT perfusion categories remains unclear. This retrospective study included 38 917 patients without prior CAD referred for clinically indicated SPECT MPI at Houston Methodist Hospital. SPECT was performed per ASNC guidelines using exercise or pharmacological stress (regadenoson).3 TPD was quantified and patients were categorized as TPD = 0 (no perfusion burden), TPD >0 and ≤10% (intermediate), or TPD >10% (significant). SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and current smoking were summed (0–4). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction. Multivariable Cox models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, LVEF, ischaemia, and scar; incremental discrimination was assessed using the likelihood ratio test and Harrell's C-index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghazawi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=38,917). Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factor (SMuRF) burden vs. Lower SMuRF burden was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction. The prognostic value of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factor burden across SPECT perfusion categories was evaluated, but no results were reported in the abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: