Reproducibility package supports the certification framework for gravity-mediated entanglement experiments, implying analytical and numerical validation.
This repository contains the computational reproducibility and verification package accompanying the frozen Version v1.0 manuscript: “Phase Curvature and Assumption-Budgeted Certification in Gravity-Mediated Entanglement.” The associated manuscript develops an operational certification framework for gravity-mediated entanglement experiments. Its central aim is to quantify when an observed entanglement signal excludes a specified neighborhood of local classical-mediator models under explicit assumptions and separately controlled nuisance channels. The package supports the manuscript’s analytical and numerical results concerning: gauge-invariant nonseparable phase curvature for diagonal two-path interactions; exact concurrence and separability-distance formulas for pure two-qubit outputs; assumption-budgeted exclusion bounds around the classical-mediator free class; primal and dual PPT/semidefinite-program certification; finite-shot confidence bounds for experimentally accessible Pauli correlators; certified residual bounds for physically compensated coherent nuisance interactions; stochastic geometry and Casimir–Polder uncertainty budgets; matter-bypass and common-auxiliary-channel bookkeeping; circular-shield mode analysis, including the azimuthal matched-null obstruction; thermal shield-channel factorization; finite-footprint high-mode suppression; an analytic positive high-mode tail bound for the shield benchmark; and a conservative outward-rounded audit of the finite numerical mode block. The frozen manuscript does not claim that a particular experimental apparatus has already closed every systematic-error channel. Quantities such as preparation error, matter-channel leakage, shield-model discrepancy, control error, and readout error remain apparatus-dependent inputs to the certification framework. Package contents The archive includes: the frozen Version v1.0 manuscript source; deterministic verification scripts for the theorem-core identities; finite-shot and Casimir–Polder statistical/geometry checks; shield-mode and analytic-tail verification; conservative floating-point interval/audit checks; submission-interface regression checks; machine-readable verification reports; and a SHA256 manifest for file-integrity verification. All verification scripts distributed with the Version v1.0 package return PASS under the documented software environment. The numerical audit is intended as a transparent reproducibility layer for the stated model calculations. It should not be interpreted as a formal interval-special-function proof or as certification of a realized experimental apparatus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byoungwoo Lee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: