The ‘virtual water’ thesis is beginning to take centre stage in the water security global discourse. From its origins as a conceptual tool for countering the gloomy Malthusian (‘water scarcity leads to water wars’) argument, it is now increasingly seen as a serious prescriptive tool for the redistribution of water from water-rich to water-poor regions of the world. The authors interrogate the thesis from a political economy and sustainable livelihoods perspective, arguing that the indiscriminate use of ‘virtual water’ as a prescriptive tool has important implications for the security, vulnerability and livelihood strategies of actors within nation-states. Adopting such an approach could turn what is a highly illuminating analytical concept—‘virtual water’—into a deleterious policy instrument. The water may very well be characterised as ‘virtual’ but the people and politics are very ‘real’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warner et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: