Terrestrial plant and soil respiration, or ecosystem respiration (R eco ), represents a major CO 2 flux in the global carbon cycle. However, there is disagreement in how R eco will respond to future global changes, such as elevated atmosphere CO 2 and warming. To address this, we synthesized six years (2007–2012) of R eco data from the Prairie Heating And CO 2 Enrichment ( PHACE ) experiment. We applied a semi‐mechanistic temperature–response model to simultaneously evaluate the response of R eco to three treatment factors (elevated CO 2 , warming, and soil water manipulation) and their interactions with antecedent soil conditions [e.g., past soil water content ( SWC ) and temperature (SoilT)] and aboveground factors (e.g., vapor pressure deficit, photosynthetically active radiation, vegetation greenness). The model fits the observed R eco well ( R 2 = 0.77). We applied the model to estimate annual (March–October) R eco , which was stimulated under elevated CO 2 in most years, likely due to the indirect effect of elevated CO 2 on SWC . When aggregated from 2007 to 2012, total six‐year R eco was stimulated by elevated CO 2 singly (24%) or in combination with warming (28%). Warming had little effect on annual R eco under ambient CO 2 , but stimulated it under elevated CO 2 (32% across all years) when precipitation was high (e.g., 44% in 2009, a ‘wet’ year). Treatment‐level differences in R eco can be partly attributed to the effects of antecedent SoilT and vegetation greenness on the apparent temperature sensitivity of R eco and to the effects of antecedent and current SWC and vegetation activity (greenness modulated by VPD ) on R eco base rates. Thus, this study indicates that the incorporation of both antecedent environmental conditions and aboveground vegetation activity are critical to predicting R eco at multiple timescales (subdaily to annual) and under a future climate of elevated CO 2 and warming.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryan et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: