Conceptual paper explores how community capacities enhance tourism resilience, suggesting policy changes are needed.
The dominant discourse on tourism resilience has traditionally emphasized physical infrastructure, environmental management, and technological solutions as key mechanisms for adapting destinations to climate change and socio-economic disruptions. While these dimensions remain essential, growing evidence suggests that the long-term sustainability of tourism destinations, particularly in remote and vulnerable regions, depends equally on less visible but equally essential community capacities. This paper introduces the concept of human infrastructure as a complementary perspective for understanding resilience in tourism development. Human infrastructure encompasses social relationships, local leadership, collective efficacy, cultural identity, community participation, intergenerational knowledge transfer, and educational capacity, which enable communities to adapt, recover, and innovate under conditions of uncertainty. Drawing upon an integrative conceptual review of the literature on tourism studies, community psychology, rural development, resilience theory, and sustainable development, this conceptual paper proposes a human-centered framework explaining how communities themselves function as adaptive infrastructures. The article argues that resilient tourism destinations emerge not only from investments in roads, visitor centers, and digital technologies, but also from investments in social cohesion, local knowledge systems, community empowerment, and cultural continuity. The paper concludes by discussing policy implications for sustainable tourism planning and proposing future research directions for operationalizing and measuring human infrastructure in tourism contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iosim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: