Key result
Iron supplementation fails to reduce composite adverse events in HF.
Why the study?
Does iron supplementation improve clinical outcomes in patients with iron-deficient heart failure?
Cohort (n=211)
No
Does iron supplementation improve clinical outcomes in patients with iron-deficient heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 96.7% vs 95.7%
p-value: p=0.803
In this retrospective cohort, iron supplementation in heart failure patients was paradoxically associated with worse clinical outcomes, highlighting the strong presence of confounding by indication in real-world practice and reinforcing the need for randomized trials.
Objective: The prevalence and clinical impact of iron deficiency (ID) in patients with heart failure (HF) in Oman remain insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of ID and its association with clinical outcomes, as well as to assess the impact of iron supplementation on hospitalization and mortality among HF patients. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study included adult patients (≥18 years) with HF who had ≥2 iron profiles; patients with end-stage renal disease were excluded. ID was defined using American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria. Results: Of 2246 patients screened, 211 met inclusion criteria (57.8% female; mean age 70 ± 12.7 years). ID prevalence was 68.3% (AHA) and 71.1% (ESC), with ESC criteria detecting more biochemical deficiencies. ID was associated with higher all-cause and HF-related readmissions (p < 0.01), longer length of stay (p = 0.045), and more atrial fibrillation (AF) (p < 0.01). All-cause mortality was similar, although the composite of mortality and readmission was slightly higher with ID (p = 0.052). Iron supplementation significantly increased ferritin (+32 ng/mL) and transferrin saturation (+2.8%) (p < 0.01) and was linked to fewer strokes (p = 0.049), with no major differences in other outcomes. Conclusions: The study found that ID was highly prevalent; however, systematic screening was not routinely practiced, which largely led to delayed initiation of appropriate management. Routine ESC-guided ID screening and management are recommended. However, given the retrospective, non-randomized study design, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of a causal treatment effect and are likely influenced by confounding by indication. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abunaser et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=211). Iron supplementation vs. No iron supplementation was evaluated on Composite adverse events (death, hospitalization, or emergency visits) in propensity score-matched cohort (p=0.803). In heart failure patients, iron supplementation significantly improved iron indices and was linked to fewer strokes, but showed no significant difference in composite adverse events after propensity score matching.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: