Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This conceptual paper discusses neurobiological insights into high-conflict parental disputes and their impact on child welfare, suggesting interventions and preventive measures.
This paper conceptualises high-conflict parental disputes as a relationship-related stress process by integrating neurobiological, developmental, legal psychological, and systemic perspectives. It argues that persistent interparental conflict and the intentional disruption of parent-child relationships constitute chronic stressors that may adversely affect children's emotional development, attachment security, and mental health. The article reviews the neurobiological foundations of attachment, stress regulation, and children's suggestibility, emphasising that children's expressed wishes must always be interpreted within the context of their attachment relationships and loyalty conflicts. The paper further discusses implications for family law, mediation, intervention, and prevention, advocating an evidence-based and interdisciplinary approach to high-conflict family disputes. It concludes that early interventions aimed at preserving secure parent-child relationships are essential for promoting child welfare and preventing long-term psychosocial harm.]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jorge Guerra (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: