Why the study?
Does an investigation of primary PLATO trial records and unpublished FDA data support the reliability of ticagrelor's reported superiority over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does an investigation of primary PLATO trial records and unpublished FDA data support the reliability of ticagrelor's reported superiority over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This investigative report uncovers significant data reporting omissions, endpoint adjudication asymmetries, and monitoring concerns in the landmark PLATO trial, supporting calls to reappraise guideline recommendations for ticagrelor over clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome.
A top selling antiplatelet drug has never quite shaken off doubts about its advantage over cheaper rivals. With generic versions of ticagrelor about to launch, Peter Doshi takes a fresh look at the evidence
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Doshi (2024) studied Acute coronary syndrome. Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Data integrity, endpoint adjudication accuracy, and death reporting in the PLATO trial.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: