Key result
Offline STIC M-mode detected significantly decreased right longitudinal annular displacement in growth-restricted fetuses compared to controls (6.7 vs 7.2 mm, p=0.033), whereas online M-mode did not.
Why the study?
Does offline STIC M-mode improve the detection of decreased longitudinal annular displacement in growth-restricted fetuses compared to online M-mode?
Case-Control (n=112)
Does offline STIC M-mode improve the detection of decreased longitudinal annular displacement in growth-restricted fetuses compared to online M-mode?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.7% vs 7.2%
p-value: p=0.033
Offline STIC M-mode is more sensitive than online M-mode for detecting subtle decreases in fetal cardiac longitudinal annular displacement associated with fetal growth restriction.
Offline STIC M-mode may detect subtle fetal cardiac changes missed online; leaves open its clinical role in growth restriction.
PURPOSE: Our first aim was to compare online M-mode with offline spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) M-mode for assessing longitudinal annular displacement (LAD) in growth-restricted fetuses (FGR). Our second aim was to compare LAD measures of FGR cases with controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study including 40 FGR cases (defined estimated fetal weight and birth weight <10th centile) and 72 normally grown fetuses matched to cases by gestational age at scan. LAD was measured with online M-mode and offline STIC M-mode at the left and right ventricular free walls and septum in all fetuses. RESULTS: FGR cases had a significant decrease in LAD by STIC in all sites as compared to controls (e.g. right LAD in FGR mean 6.7 mm (SD 1.2) versus controls 7.2 mm (1.2), p = .033). There was a non-significant trend for lower values in FGR when using online M-mode (e.g. right LAD in FGR 6.9 mm (1.5) versus controls 7.4 mm (1.5), p = .084). CONCLUSIONS: STIC M-mode seems a better method than online M-mode for detecting subtle changes in myocardial motion. STIC presents more precise results and allows an ideal placement of the M-mode arrow. These results confirm previous data suggesting decreased longitudinal motion in FGR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanis et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Fetal growth restriction (n=112). Fetal growth restriction vs. Normally grown fetuses was evaluated on Right longitudinal annular displacement (LAD) by STIC M-mode (p=0.033). Offline STIC M-mode detected significantly decreased right longitudinal annular displacement in growth-restricted fetuses compared to controls (6.7 vs 7.2 mm, p=0.033), whereas online M-mode did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: