Key result
An intensive 9-month lifestyle intervention program significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure and increased adiponectin levels compared to a traditional medical consultation program in adults with pre-diabetes or metabolic syndrome.
Why the study?
Does an intensive multi-professional lifestyle intervention improve cardiometabolic parameters more than traditional medical consultations in adults with pre-diabetes or metabolic syndrome?
RCT (n=180)
Open-label
Randomly allocated
No
Does an intensive multi-professional lifestyle intervention improve cardiometabolic parameters more than traditional medical consultations in adults with pre-diabetes or metabolic syndrome?
An intensive multi-professional lifestyle intervention program is more effective than traditional medical consultations at improving blood pressure and adiponectin levels in high-risk individuals in a public health setting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports intensive multi-professional programs for diastolic BP control in pre-diabetes; extends RCT evidence versus standard consultations.
UNLABELLED: Public health strategies to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality should focus on global cardiometabolic risk reduction. The efficacy of lifestyle changes to prevent type 2 diabetes have been demonstrated, but low-cost interventions to reduce cardiometabolic risk in Latin-America have been rarely reported. Our group developed 2 programs to promote health of high-risk individuals attending a primary care center in Brazil. This study compared the effects of two 9-month lifestyle interventions, one based on medical consultations (traditional) and another with 13 multi-professional group sessions in addition to the medical consultations (intensive) on cardiometabolic parameters. Adults were eligible if they had pre-diabetes (according to the American Diabetes Association) and/or metabolic syndrome (International Diabetes Federation criteria for Latin-America). Data were expressed as means and standard deviations or percentages and compared between groups or testing visits. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 180 individuals agreed to participate (35.0% men, mean age 54.7 ± 12.3 years, 86.1% overweight or obese). 83 were allocated to the traditional and 97 to the intensive program. Both interventions reduced body mass index, waist circumference and tumor necrosis factor-α. Only intensive program reduced 2-hour plasma glucose and blood pressure and increased adiponectin values, but HDL-cholesterol increased only in the traditional. Also, responses to programs were better in intensive compared to traditional program in terms of blood pressure and adiponectin improvements. No new case of diabetes in intensive but 3 cases and one myocardial infarction in traditional program were detected. Both programs induced metabolic improvement in the short-term, but if better results in the intensive are due to higher awareness about risk and self-motivation deserves further investigation. In conclusion, these low-cost interventions are able to minimize cardiometabolic risk factors involved in the progression to type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siqueira-Catania et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Pre-diabetes and/or metabolic syndrome (n=180). Intensive lifestyle intervention vs. Traditional program (4 medical consultations) was evaluated on Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) at 9 months (p=<0.001). An intensive 9-month lifestyle intervention program significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure and increased adiponectin levels compared to a traditional medical consultation program in adults with pre-diabetes or metabolic syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: