Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Sariah Liu 1, * , Mina Nikanjam 2, * , Razelle Kurzrock 3 1 Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA 2 Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA 3 Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Mina Nikanjam, e-mail: mnikanjam@mednet.ucla.edu Keywords: oncology, targeted therapy, maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose, precision medicine Received: October 05, 2015 Accepted: January 15, 2016 Published: January 25, 2016 ABSTRACT Metastatic cancers harbor complex genomic alterations. Thus, monotherapies are often suboptimal. Individualized combinations are needed in order to attenuate resistance. To help inform selection of safe starting doses for novel, two-agent, targeted drug combinations, we identified clinical trials in adult oncology patients who received targeted drug doublets (PubMed, January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2013). The dose percentage was calculated for each drug: (safe dose in combination divided by single agent full dose) X 100. Additive dose percentage represented the sum of the dose percentage for each drug. A total of 144 studies (N = 8568 patients; 95 combinations) were analyzed. In 51% of trials, each of the two drugs could be administered at 100% of their full dose. The lowest safe additive dose percentage was 60% if targets and/or class of drugs overlapped, or in the presence of mTor inhibitors, which sometimes compromised the combination dose. If neither class nor target overlapped and if mTor inhibitors were absent, the lowest safe additive dose percentage was 143%. The current observations contribute to the knowledge base that informs safe starting doses for new combinations of targeted drugs in the context of clinical trials or practice, hence facilitating customized combination therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: