Key result
Athletic training was associated with a higher prevalence of potentially pathological ECG signs compared to controls, including T-wave changes (15.0% vs. 5.6%, p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does athletic training increase the prevalence of physiological and pathological ECG findings compared to non-athlete controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=316)
Does athletic training increase the prevalence of physiological and pathological ECG findings compared to non-athlete controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 15% vs 5.6%
p-value: p=<0.05
Athletes have a significantly higher prevalence of both benign and potentially pathological ECG changes compared to controls, emphasizing the need for careful cardiological evaluation during sports screening.
May warrant cautious ECG interpretation in athletes to avoid overdiagnosis; leaves open need for longitudinal validation of clinical significance.
UNLABELLED: In Hungary, ECG is a keystone of routine athletic screening. Its significance is based on simplicity, quickness and high informative value as well as the fact that appearance of pathological ECG signs can precede the formation of structural heart diseases. During screening of healthy athletes, we studied the incidence of athletic ECG changes and pathological ECG abnormalities. METHODS: We performed detailed analysis of 12-lead ECG recordings of asymptomatic elite, non-elite and master athletes and controls. RESULTS: 227 athletes (male: 180, age: 27.2 ± 8.7 years) and 89 controls (male: 57, age: 28.1 ± 6.8 years) were examined. Benign ECG signs: sinus bradycardia, early repolarization and isolated Voltage criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy were common and more often in athletes compared to controls. Potentially pathological ECG signs: ST- (6.6% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.05) and T-wave (15.0% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.05) changes and signs of pathological left ventricular hypertrophy (5.3% vs. 0%, p < 0.05) occurred more frequently in athletes compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Signs of pathological left ventricular hypertrophy and repolarization abnormalities are more often in athletes. No structural heart disease could be verified in the background of the disorders. However, athletes having pathological ECG should be kept under tight cardiology control. Exact definition and widespread knowledge of pathological ECG changes is essential in early recognition of high risk athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiss et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy athletes (n=316). Athletic training vs. Controls (non-athletes) was evaluated on T-wave changes (p=<0.05). Athletic training was associated with a higher prevalence of potentially pathological ECG signs compared to controls, including T-wave changes (15.0% vs. 5.6%, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: