Why the study?
Does presenting pulse pressure predict thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage better than other blood pressure measurements in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction?
Population
194 subjects drawn from a cohort of 3,483 Thrombolytic Predictive Instrument Project subjects receiving…
Comparison
Presenting pulse blood pressure and excess pulse… vs Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood…
Design
Case-control
Authors
Loading...
May support pulse pressure assessment for ICH risk stratification in AMI thrombolysis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Does presenting pulse pressure predict thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage better than other blood pressure measurements in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction?
Presenting excess pulse pressure is a strong predictor of thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute myocardial infarction, outperforming systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial pressures.
Selker et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: