Key result
Oral semaglutide cuts MACE ~14%, with greatest benefit seen in patients with higher baseline HbA1c.
Why the study?
Does oral semaglutide reduce 3-point MACE across different baseline or changes in HbA1c and BMI in adults with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD and/or CKD?
RCT (n=9,650)
double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does oral semaglutide reduce 3-point MACE across different baseline or changes in HbA1c and BMI in adults with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD and/or CKD?
The cardiovascular benefits of oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk appear to be driven more by glycemic control (HbA1c reduction) than by weight loss (BMI reduction).
CONTEXT: In the SOUL trial (NCT03914326), oral semaglutide reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE) by 14%. Whether baseline or changes in HbA1c or BMI are associated with these CV benefits is not known. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether CV benefits of oral semaglutide are associated with baseline or in-trial reductions in HbA1c or BMI. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of SOUL, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2019‒2024). SETTING: International, 444 sites. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged ≥50 years, with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic CV disease and/or chronic kidney disease. INTERVENTION(S): Oral semaglutide or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 3-point MACE (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) analyzed by baseline and in-trial changes in HbA1c and BMI (Weeks 13; 52). RESULTS: 9650 adults randomized 1:1 to oral semaglutide or placebo were followed for 47.5 months. Median (IQR) age was 66 (61-72) years, mean (±SD) HbA1c 8.0 (1.1)% (63.5±12.5 mmol/mol) and BMI 31.1 (5.8) kg/m2. MACE benefits from oral semaglutide were significantly different across baseline HbA1c categories (P-interaction = .04), suggesting greater risk reduction at higher baseline HbA1c, but were consistent across baseline BMI categories. Greater in-trial HbA1c reductions were associated with larger decreases in MACE risk with oral semaglutide at 13 and 52 weeks (P-interactions .005 and < .001, respectively), whereas BMI changes showed consistency (P-interactions .88 and .64, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In SOUL, CV benefits of oral semaglutide appeared more pronounced among participants with higher baseline HbA1c and greater HbA1c reductions, but were consistent across baseline or changes in BMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inzucchi et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic CV disease and/or chronic kidney disease (n=9,650). Oral semaglutide vs. placebo was evaluated on 3-point MACE (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) (p=.04 for interaction). Oral semaglutide reduced MACE by 14% overall, with greater benefits in participants with higher baseline HbA1c (P-interaction=.04) and greater HbA1c reductions (P-interaction<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: