Key result
Incomplete reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy was associated with a significantly lower chance of achieving functional independence at 90 days compared with complete or near-complete reperfusion (aIRR 0.82).
Why the study?
Data on the impact of incomplete reperfusion phenomena after mechanical thrombectomy on clinical outcomes are limited.
Does incomplete reperfusion, specifically with MT-accessible versus non-MT-accessible occlusion patterns, worsen 90-day functional outcomes compared to complete reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients?
Observational (n=949)
Yes
Does incomplete reperfusion, specifically with MT-accessible versus non-MT-accessible occlusion patterns, worsen 90-day functional outcomes compared to complete reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients?
Incomplete reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy is associated with worse clinical outcomes than complete reperfusion, particularly when the residual occlusion is accessible to further thrombectomy attempts.
IR after MT was associated with worse outcomes; extends observations on reperfusion patterns but leaves open targeted interventions for non-occlusive causes.
BACKGROUND: Incomplete reperfusion (IR) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can be a consequence of residual occlusion, no-reflow phenomenon, or collateral counterpressure. Data on the impact of these phenomena on clinical outcome are limited. METHODS: Patients from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial with IR (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b) were compared with those with complete or near-complete reperfusion (eTICI 2c-3) on the final angiography run. Final runs were assessed for (a) an MT-accessible occlusion, or (b) a non-MT-accessible occlusion pattern. The primary clinical outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Our imaging outcome was infarction in IR territory on follow-up imaging. Unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained. RESULTS: Of 1105 patients, 443 (40.1%) with IR and 506 (46.1%) with complete or near-complete reperfusion were included. An MT-accessible occlusion was identified in 147/443 patients (33.2%) and a non-MT-accessible occlusion in 296/443 (66.8%). As compared with patients with near-complete/complete reperfusion, patients with IR had significantly lower chances of achieving mRS 0-2 at 90 days (aIRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91). Rates of mRS 0-2 were lower in the MT-accessible occlusion group as compared with the non-MT-accessible occlusion pattern group (aIRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, and aIRR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98, respectively). More patients with MT-accessible occlusion patterns developed infarcts in the non-reperfused territory as compared with patients with non-MT occlusion patterns (68.7% vs 46.3%). CONCLUSION: IR was associated with worse clinical outcomes than near-complete/complete reperfusion. Two-thirds of our patients with IR had non-MT-accessible occlusion patterns which were associated with better clinical and imaging outcomes compared with those with MT-accessible occlusion patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cimflová et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (n=949). Incomplete reperfusion (eTICI 2b) vs. Complete or near-complete reperfusion (eTICI 2c-3) was evaluated on Functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2) (aIRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91). Incomplete reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy was associated with a significantly lower chance of achieving functional independence at 90 days compared with complete or near-complete reperfusion (aIRR 0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: