The possibility that serological analysis may be more sensitive than bacteriological examinations of stool samples to detect enteric infections was evaluated in 80 Swedish travellers to South-East Asia. Serum and faecal specimens were collected before, during and after their travel. Serological analyses of pre-travel and any later serum specimen identified infection with enterotoxinogenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), Salmonella or Campylobacter jejuni in 28% of the travellers. The seroconversion rate was 72% in travellers excreting the homologous pathogen in their stool; all symptomatic cases and half of those who had an asymptomatic infection seroconverted. Bacteriological examinations of stool samples collected repeatedly during travel identified an enteropathogen in 20% of the travellers. However, the isolation rate decreased to 11%, when only a single routine faecal specimen was examined. Our findings suggest that serological analyses of pre- and post-travel specimens are sufficiently specific and may be at least as sensitive as conventional bacteriology to identify infections with bacterial enteropathogens in travellers. However, reliable serodiagnosis requires collection of pre-travel sera and might therefore only be useful in prospective studies of travellers' diarrhoea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jertborn et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: