AIMS: The aim of the pilot SECRITT trial was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of sealing the high risk IVUS and optical coherence tomography-derived thin cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), with a dedicated nitinol self-expanding vShield device. METHODS AND RESULTS: After screening with angiography, fractional flow reserve (FFR), intravascular ultrasound virtual histology (IVUS-VH) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), 23 patients met enrolment criteria (presence of non-obstructive VH-derived TCFA lesion with thin cap on OCT) and were randomised to vShield (n=13) versus medical therapy (n=10). In the shielded group, baseline percent diameter stenosis was 33.2±13.5%, FFR was 0.93±0.06. At six-month follow-up in shielded patients percent diameter stenosis further decreased to 18.7±16.9% and FFR remained the same 0.93±0.05. Average late loss was 0.24±0.13 mm. Average baseline fibrous cap thickness was 48±12 µm. After shield placement at six-month follow-up neo-cap formation was observed with average cap thickness of 201±168 µm. There were no dissections after shield placement and no plaque ruptures. In addition, mean stent area of 8.76±2.16 mm2 increased to 9.45±2.30 mm2, that is by 9% at six-month follow-up. The number of malapposed struts decreased from 10.7% to 7.6% and the number of uncovered struts at six months was 8.1%. There were no device-related major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) events at six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: High risk plaque passivation and sealing with a vShield self-expanding nitinol device appears feasible and safe. A long-term larger randomised study with streamlined screening criteria is needed to evaluate the efficacy of this approach over medical therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wykrzykowska et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: