Key result
Bolus insulin glulisine resulted in a significantly lower M-value for glucose variability at the end-point compared to basal insulin glargine (9.1 vs 21.4, p=0.002).
Why the study?
The comparative effects of basal versus bolus insulin regimens on metabolic and cardiovascular autonomic function in patients with type 2 diabetes were unclear.
Does insulin glulisine compared to insulin glargine improve glycemic variability and sympathovagal balance in hospitalized patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=44)
Open-label
Computer-generated randomization sequence
No
Does insulin glulisine compared to insulin glargine improve glycemic variability and sympathovagal balance in hospitalized patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes?
In hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, bolus insulin glulisine provided greater reduction in glucose variability, while basal insulin glargine uniquely improved night-time parasympathetic tone.
Bolus insulin may reduce glycemic variability more than basal; leaves open whether basal's autonomic effects warrant regimen preference in type 2 diabetes.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: This study compares the effects of two different insulin regimens - basal versus bolus insulin - on metabolic and cardiovascular autonomic function in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to groups for therapy with insulin glulisine (IGlu) or insulin glargine (IGla). The primary efficacy end-point was glycemic variability, including M-values, mean of glucose levels, and a blood glucose profile of seven time points before and after the intervention. The secondary end-points included pleiotropic effects, including endothelial and cardiac autonomic nerve functions. RESULTS: Blood glucose levels at all time points significantly decreased in both groups. Post-lunch, post-dinner, and bedtime blood glucose levels were significantly lower in the IGlu group than in the IGla group. Nadir fasting blood glucose levels at the end-point were significantly lower in the IGla group than in the IGlu group. The M-value and mean blood glucose levels were significantly decreased from baseline in both groups, although the former was significantly lower in the IGlu group than in the IGla group. IGla, but not IGlu, was found to elevate 24-h parasympathetic tone, especially during night-time, and it decreased 24-h sympathetic nerve activity, especially at dawn. CONCLUSIONS: Both IGlu and IGla regimens reduced glucose variability, with IGlu bringing a greater reduction in M-value. IGla, but not IGlu, increased parasympathetic tone during night-time and decreased sympathetic nerve activity at dawn. These findings shed light on the previously unrecognized role of night-time basal insulin supplementation on sympathovagal activity in type 2 diabetes patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeshita et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes (n=44). Insulin glulisine vs. Insulin glargine was evaluated on Glycemic variability (M-value) (p=0.002). Bolus insulin glulisine resulted in a significantly lower M-value for glucose variability at the end-point compared to basal insulin glargine (9.1 vs 21.4, p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: