This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper proposes PINN+RMF, a physics-informed and vision-guided framework for robust 3D shape reconstruction using multi-core fiber Bragg grating (MCFBG) sensors. It maps node-wise spectral responses to interpretable local states—including curvature, bending direction, and temperature variation—using calibration parameters as physical priors. A differentiable rotation-minimizing-frame (RMF) layer integrates these states into the global centerline while suppressing torsion-induced orientation drift. Synchronized stereo vision provides coordinate-level supervision, and coarse-to-fine optimization first enforces local physical consistency and then refines global geometry. Experiments on a 1000-mm flexible rod yield a mean point error of 0.93 mm and a mean tip error of 1.62 mm (P95 tip error 5.18 mm, i.e., 0.52% of the rod length). RMF integration substantially reduces frame drift under 3D twisting: in a spatial-twist case, the maximum point-wise error drops from 9.40 mm with Frenet integration to 1.44 mm with RMF. Under a 3-mm tip-error tolerance, PINN+RMF consistently achieves higher success rates than the Frenet-based and end-to-end baselines across the test set. Simulations under calibration perturbations and multi-source uncertainties further demonstrate progressive rather than abrupt degradation, with the mean tip error increasing gradually from 1.86 mm (clean) to 4.16, 8.39, and 22.47 mm under 1%, 2%, and 5% wavelength noise, respectively. These results establish PINN+RMF as a robust and interpretable approach for precision-critical MCFBG shape sensing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: