Key result
NT-proBNP testing implementation in acute decompensated heart failure reduced mean hospital stay by 1.86 days (P=0.03) and the 60-day composite of death or rehospitalization by 18.7% (P=0.008).
Why the study?
Does the implementation of NT-proBNP testing reduce hospital length of stay and 60-day morbidity and mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Observational
No
Does the implementation of NT-proBNP testing reduce hospital length of stay and 60-day morbidity and mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The routine clinical implementation of NT-proBNP testing for acute decompensated heart failure is associated with significant reductions in hospital length of stay and 60-day mortality and rehospitalization.
Context.—In clinical trials, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing has been shown to be valuable for diagnosis and triage of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. It is not yet clear what benefits might be expected from the initiation of NT-proBNP testing in an everyday clinical setting. Objective.—To determine the effects of NT-proBNP testing on hospital length of stay as well as on 60-day morbidity and mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure before and after the test was implemented in the clinical laboratory. Design.—We measured hospital length of stay and 60-day morbidity and mortality rates among patients with acute decompensated heart failure admitted before and after initiation of NT-proBNP testing in our hospital. Differences in demographics between preimplementation and postimplementation groups were compared with the χ2 test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Comparison between the hospital length of stay for each group was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences in rates of rehospitalization or death at 60 days following presentation were assessed using χ2 cross-tabulation. Results.—Patients in the postimplementation group had similar clinical features as those in the preimplementation group. The hospital length of stay for patients in the postimplementation study group decreased both with respect to mean (1.86-day reduction) and median (1.3-day reduction) hospital stay (both, P = .03). Additionally, significantly lower rates of death (6.6% absolute risk reduction, P = .01), rehospitalization (12.1% absolute risk reduction, P = .005), and the composite of the 2 rates (18.7% absolute risk reduction, P = .008) were found following initiation of NT-proBNP testing. Conclusions.—Implementation of NT-proBNP testing may result in significant reductions in hospital length of stay as well as improvements in rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Green et al. (2007) conducted an observational in acute decompensated heart failure. NT-proBNP testing vs. Before implementation of NT-proBNP testing was evaluated on composite of death and rehospitalization at 60 days (ARR 18.7%, p=.008). NT-proBNP testing implementation in acute decompensated heart failure reduced mean hospital stay by 1.86 days (P=0.03) and the 60-day composite of death or rehospitalization by 18.7% (P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: