This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background and purpose - Unnecessary radiographic and clinical follow-ups are common in treatment of pediatric fractures. We hypothesized that follow-up radiographs are unnecessary to monitor union of physeal fractures of the distal tibia.Patients and methods - All 224 (147 boys) children under 16 years old treated for a physeal fracture of the distal tibia during a 5-year period (2010-14) in Helsinki Children's Hospital were included in this study. Peterson type II fractures comprised 55% and transitional fractures (Tillaux and Triplane) 20% of all injuries. Fracture displacement and alignment was measured. Type and place of treatment was recorded. Number of follow-up radiographs and outpatient visits was calculated and their clinical significance was assessed.Results - 109 children had fractures with < 2 mm displacement and no angulation. The other 115 children's mean fracture displacement was 6 mm (2-28). 54% of all children were treated by casting in situ in the emergency room, 20% with manipulation under anesthesia and 26% with surgery (internal 57, external fixation 2). Median 3 (1-7) follow-up appointments and median 3 (0-6) radiographs were taken. Follow-up radiographs at or before cast removal did not alter treatment in any of the patients. 223 patients' fractures healed within 4-9 weeks in good alignment (≤ 5° angulation).Interpretation - Routine radiographic follow-up is unnecessary to monitor alignment and union of physeal fractures of the distal tibia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stenroos et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: