Key result
Slow-paced breathing immediately improves executive function versus control, independent of heart rate variability.
Why the study?
The neurovisceral integration model predicts that higher cardiac vagal activity improves executive functioning, but the immediate effects of slow-paced breathing on executive function remained to be tested.
Does slow-paced breathing improve immediate executive function compared to a television viewing control condition?
RCT (n=78)
Open-label
Counterbalanced within-subject crossover
No
Does slow-paced breathing improve immediate executive function compared to a television viewing control condition?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Slow-paced breathing appears to be a promising technique to immediately improve executive function performance, although the effect does not seem to be mediated by cardiac vagal activity.
The aim of this experiment was to test the immediate effects of slow-paced breathing on executive function. Slow-paced breathing is suggested to increase cardiac vagal activity, and the neurovisceral integration model predicts that higher cardiac vagal activity leads to better executive functioning. In total, 78 participants (41 men, 37 women; M age = 23.22 years) took part in two counterbalanced experimental conditions: a 3 × 5 min slow-paced breathing condition and a television viewing control condition. After each condition, heart rate variability was measured and participants performed three executive function tasks: the color-word match Stroop (inhibition), the automated operation span task (working memory), and the modified card sorting task (cognitive flexibility). Results showed that performance on executive function tasks was better after slow-paced breathing compared to control, with higher scores observed for Stroop interference accuracy, automated operation span score, and perseverative errors, but not Stroop interference reaction times. This difference in executive function between experimental conditions was not mediated by cardiac vagal activity. Therefore, findings only partially align with predictions of the neurovisceral integration model. Slow-paced breathing appears a promising technique to improve immediate executive function performance. Further studies are recommended that address possible alternative underlying mechanisms and long-term effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laborde et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Healthy young adults (Executive function) (n=78). Slow-paced breathing vs. Spontaneous breathing while watching an emotionally neutral TV documentary was evaluated on Executive function performance (Stroop interference accuracy, automated operation span score, and modified card sorting task perseverative errors). Slow-paced breathing (3 x 5 min at 6 cycles/min) immediately improved executive function (Stroop accuracy, working memory span, and cognitive flexibility) vs control in 78 adults, independent of HRV.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: