Why the study?
Despite molecular neuroimaging being essential for evaluating novel CNS drugs, limited data have been available to inform how to optimize study designs.
Likelihood-based methods provide more precise IC50 estimates than the Lassen plot in PET neuroimaging drug occupancy studies, requiring fewer subjects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide future molecular neuroimaging study designs for CNS drugs; leaves open empirical validation of simulation recommendations.
Molecular neuroimaging is today considered essential for evaluation of novel CNS drugs; it is used to quantify blood-brain barrier permeability, verify interaction with key target and determine the drug dose resulting in 50% occupancy, IC50. In spite of this, there has been limited data available to inform on how to optimize study designs. Through simulations, we here evaluate how IC50 estimation is affected by the (i) range of drug doses administered, (ii) number of subjects included, and (iii) level of noise in the plasma drug concentration measurements. Receptor occupancy is determined from PET distribution volumes using two different methods: the Lassen plot and Likelihood estimation of occupancy (LEO). We also introduce and evaluate a new likelihood-based estimator for direct estimation of IC50 from PET distribution volumes. For estimation of IC50, we find very limited added benefit in scanning individuals who are given drug doses corresponding to less than 40% receptor occupancy. In the range of typical PET sample sizes (5–20 subjects) each extra individual clearly reduces the error of the IC50 estimate. In all simulations, likelihood-based methods gave more precise IC50 estimates than the Lassen plot; four times the number of subjects were required for the Lassen plot to reach the same IC50 precision as LEO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laurell et al. (2022) studied this question. Likelihood-based methods (LEO) vs. Lassen plot was evaluated on Precision of IC50 estimates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: