Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences in opioid use and length of stay (LOS) in patients treated with fascia iliaca (FI) blocks for a hip fracture compared with patients not receiving an FI block. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nine University and Community Hospitals. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Included were adults who underwent intramedullary nailing for hip fractures (OTA/AO 31A or OTA/AO 32) between January 2022 and October 2023 who either received a FI block or did not before fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes of the study are Morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) during admission and postoperative days (POD) 1-3; hospital LOS in days. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving FI blocks and those who did not. RESULTS: There were 610 patients (179 men, 431 women) included in the study. Patients receiving an FI block (N = 273) were significantly older (83.1 ± 9.7 years vs. 81.0 ± 10.2 years, range = 60-105 years, P = 0.023) and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications ( P = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed significantly less opioid use for the FI block group during overall admission (3.75 MMEs vs. 11.25 MMEs, P = 0.046), but showed no differences from POD 1-3 (0 MMEs vs. 0 MMEs, P = 0.187) or in LOS (5.08 days vs. 4.84 days, P = 0.287). After adjusting for age and ASA classification, multivariate regression revealed no significant association between FI blocks and decreased opioid consumption on POD 1 [partial eta squared (η 2 ) = 0.002, P = 0.243], POD 1-3 (η 2 = 0.002, P = 0.284), or during overall admission (η 2 = 0.004, P = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: Receiving a preoperative FI block did not decrease postoperative opioid consumption during hospitalization or LOS for older hip fracture patients when controlling for age and ASA classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: