PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of employing the prior knowledge of well-separated chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) signals in the 9.4 T Z-spectrum to separate overlapping CEST signals acquired at 3 T, using a deep learning approach trained with 3 T and 9.4 T CEST spectral data from brains of the same subjects. METHODS: = 0.6 µT. The volume-registered 3 T Z-spectra-stack was then used as input data for a three layer deep neural network with the volume-registered 9.4 T fitted parameter stack as target data. RESULTS: An optimized neural net architecture could be found and verified in healthy volunteers. The gray-/white-matter contrast of the different CEST effects was predicted with only small deviations (Pearson R = 0.89). The 9.4 T prediction was less noisy compared to the directly measured CEST maps, although at the cost of slightly lower tissue contrast. Application to an unseen tumor patient measured at 3 T and 9.4 T revealed that tumorous tissue Z-spectra and corresponding hyper-/hypointensities of different CEST effects can also be predicted (Pearson R = 0.84). CONCLUSION: The 9.4 T CEST signals acquired at low saturation power can be accurately estimated from CEST imaging at 3 T using a neural network trained with coregistered 3 T and 9.4 T data of healthy subjects. The deepCEST approach generalizes to Z-spectra of tumor areas and might indicate whether additional ultrahigh-field (UHF) scans will be beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaiß et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: