OBJECTIVE: To assess how faces with a cleft lip and palate are perceived and to study how faces with and without a unilateral cleft lip and palate are viewed by individuals with a unilateral cleft lip and/or palate in comparison to nonaffected controls. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Department of Orthodontics and Department of Psychology, University of Wuerzburg. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three participants (20 men and 13 women; mean age, 25.4 ± 6.6 years) with a unilateral cleft lip and/or palate and a control group of 30 participants (15 men and 15 women; mean age, 26.8 ± 3.4 years) were enrolled in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eye movements were analyzed via an eye-tracking camera while all participants looked at pictures of faces with and without a unilateral cleft lip and palate. RESULTS: The nose and the mouth area of pictures of faces with a unilateral cleft lip and palate were looked at significantly longer by both groups. Additionally, the participants with a unilateral cleft lip and/or palate looked at faces with and without a unilateral cleft lip and palate differently, taking more time to view the nose and less time to view the eyes compared with the participants without a cleft lip and palate. CONCLUSION: When perceiving a face with a unilateral cleft lip and palate, the observer's gaze is distracted to the nose and mouth area. Moreover, participants with a unilateral cleft lip and/or palate themselves focused greater attention on those features that are anomalous on their own faces in comparison to participants without a cleft lip and palate. Specifically, this different scanpath is reflected in the cumulative duration of the eye movements as well as in the initial facial scan pattern.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer‐Marcotty et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: