Key result
MEK inhibitor-based treatment significantly increased the risk of all-grade hypertension (RR 1.54), high-grade hypertension (RR 1.85), and decreased ejection fraction (RR 4.92) compared to control therapies in patients with cancer.
Why the study?
Does MEK inhibitor-based treatment increase the risk of cardiovascular toxicities (hypertension and decreased ejection fraction) in patients with cancer?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,704)
Does MEK inhibitor-based treatment increase the risk of cardiovascular toxicities (hypertension and decreased ejection fraction) in patients with cancer?
Relative Risk: 1.54 (95% CI 1.02–2.32)
p-value: p=<0.05
MEK inhibitors are associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade and high-grade hypertension and asymptomatic decrease in ejection fraction in patients with cancer, necessitating regular cardiovascular monitoring.
Requires intensified BP and EF monitoring with MEK inhibitors; extends cardiotoxicity evidence across oncology trials.
Purpose We conducted a literature-based meta-analysis of the risk of cardiovascular toxicities associated with MEK inhibitors. Methods Eligible trials included randomized phase II and III trials of patients with cancer who were given a mitogen activated protein (MAP)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK) inhibitor (trametinib, selumetinib, or cobimetinib) and that described events of hypertension and decreased ejection fraction. Results Our search strategy yielded 300 potentially relevant citations from PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. After ineligible studies were excluded, a total of 10 clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The relative risk for all grades of hypertension was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.02 to 2.32; P = .05), 1.85 (95% CI, 1.01 to 3.40; P = .05) for high-grade hypertension, and 4.92 (95% CI, 2.93 to 8.25; P < .001) for decreased ejection fraction. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference between trametinib and selumetinib for risk of hypertension. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that MEK inhibitor–based treatment is associated with an increased risk of all-grade and high-grade hypertension and asymptomatic decrease in ejection fraction. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and perform regular assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdel‐Rahman et al. (2015) conducted a meta-analysis in Cancer (n=2,704). MEK inhibitors (trametinib, selumetinib, or cobimetinib) vs. Control (placebo or chemotherapy/targeted therapy) was evaluated on All-grade hypertension (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.32, p=<0.05). MEK inhibitor-based treatment significantly increased the risk of all-grade hypertension (RR 1.54), high-grade hypertension (RR 1.85), and decreased ejection fraction (RR 4.92) compared to control therapies in patients with cancer.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: