Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of changing contexts on language and communication skills of adults with acquired brain injury. RESEARCH DESIGN: Repeated measures design. METHODS: Four adults with brain injury were observed in four contexts with pragmatic language and communication behaviours recorded. Contexts included baseline, two intervention phases (a 3-day camp and post-camp period) and 2-month follow-up. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated improvements in constructive language production during intervention phases. Results indicate structure, cueing and positive experiences created language which was observed to overcome the influence of organic damage. However, at follow-up, the language and communication levels returned to baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Clinically, these results have implications for the development of sustained interventions for language and communication skills in community-based rehabilitation programmes. Creating supporting contexts may serve as an effective means of improving language and communication behaviours, while also facilitating optimum community inclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellon et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: