Why the study?
Does routine mechanical prophylaxis with selective chemoprophylaxis prevent fatal pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement?
Does routine mechanical prophylaxis with selective chemoprophylaxis prevent fatal pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement?
Routine mechanical prophylaxis combined with selective chemoprophylaxis yields very low rates of fatal pulmonary embolism following joint replacement, suggesting routine chemical thromboprophylaxis may not be necessary.
Supports selective chemoprophylaxis after joint replacement; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm against routine use.
In order to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism, TED stockings, foot pumps and early mobilisation on the second post-operative day are used at our centre. Only patients deemed to be high risk (previous DVT/PE or obese) are given clexane as inpatients and warfarin for six weeks post-op. From the hospital database 1137 primary total hip replacements and 1017 primary total knee re-placements were identified and the figures were confirmed with the theatre implant order books. The cause of death for those patients on the database, now deceased, was obtained from the coroner. Where a postmortem had not been performed the patient was assumed to have died of a PE. Within three months of surgery, a fatal PE rate of 0.09% (95% CI 0.00-0.26%) following hip replacement and 0.20% (95% CI 0.00-0.46%) after knee replacement was found. Thirty-four patients had been discharged on warfarin according to the pharmacy records. We would therefore not recommend the routine use of chemical thromboprophylaxis following joint replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shepherd et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: