Consider the standard Gaussian linear regression model Y=Xθ0+ε, where Y∈ℝn is a response vector and X∈ℝn×p is a design matrix. Numerous work have been devoted to building efficient estimators of θ0 when p is much larger than n. In such a situation, a classical approach amounts to assume that θ0 is approximately sparse. This paper studies the minimax risks of estimation and testing over classes of k-sparse vectors θ0. These bounds shed light on the limitations due to high-dimensionality. The results encompass the problem of prediction (estimation of Xθ0), the inverse problem (estimation of θ0) and linear testing (testing Xθ0=0). Interestingly, an elbow effect occurs when the number of variables klog(p/k) becomes large compared to n. Indeed, the minimax risks and hypothesis separation distances blow up in this ultra-high dimensional setting. We also prove that even dimension reduction techniques cannot provide satisfying results in an ultra-high dimensional setting. Moreover, we compute the minimax risks when the variance of the noise is unknown. The knowledge of this variance is shown to play a significant role in the optimal rates of estimation and testing. All these minimax bounds provide a characterization of statistical problems that are so difficult so that no procedure can provide satisfying results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolas Verzélen (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: