Why the study?
Does ECG triggered MR imaging improve the detection and delineation of pediatric cardiac tumors compared to two-dimensional echocardiography?
Does ECG triggered MR imaging improve the detection and delineation of pediatric cardiac tumors compared to two-dimensional echocardiography?
MR imaging is inferior to echocardiography for detecting intramural rhabdomyomas but superior for delineating the intra- and extracardiac extension of nonrhabdomyomal tumors in children.
MR may detect additional intracavitary tumors missed by echo in children; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Ten children, ranging in age from 3 weeks to 11 years, with a history of primary cardiac tumors were studied by two-dimensional echocardiography and by ECG triggered magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (six of them had rhabdomyomas). Eighteen of 31 tumors with intracavitary extension diagnosed by echocardiography were detected by MR. In addition, three intracavitary tumors were found by MR but not by echocardiography. Only 2 of 15 intramural tumors detected by echocardiography were identified by MR. Magnetic resonance imaging is inferior to echocardiography in the detection of intramural rhabdomyomas, but superior in delineation of the intra- and extracardiac extension of nonrhabdomyomal tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rienmüller et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: