Citations and publications cannot be compared without a model. We combine the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) and the h-index into a single framework for multivariate measurement. We propose that the h-based I3-type publication and citation vectors can be used as multi-dimensional indicators in academic evaluations. Whereas I3 is based on the transformation of the citation distribution into quantiles, the h-index allows for defining three rank classes of both publications and citations, respectively: the publication vector X and the citation vector Y. The I3-type publication score I3X and the citation score I3Y can be used as single numbers to integrate and represent the publication vector X and citation vector Y. X and Y provide multivariate vectors, and I3X and I3Y integrate the multidimensional information. X = (X1, X2, X3) and Y = (Y1, Y2, Y3) (and I3X = X1 + X2 + X3 and I3Y = Y1 + Y2 + Y3, respectively) are practically applied to process the 3-dimensional distributions of academic information using the journals in library and information science as empirical examples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: