Identifies a highly conserved F(X)6LL motif in the carboxyl termini of G protein-coupled receptors that is essential for their transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface.
No immediate implications for receptor-targeted therapies; leaves open the motif's role in human cardiovascular GPCR function.
The structural determinants for the export trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors are poorly defined. In this report, we determined the role of carboxyl termini (CTs) of alpha2B-adrenergic receptor (AR) and angiotensin II type 1A receptor (AT1R) in their transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the cell surface. The alpha2B-AR and AT1R mutants lacking the CTs were completely unable to transport to the cell surface and were trapped in the ER. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis revealed that residues Phe436 and Ile433-Leu444 in the CT were required for alpha2B-AR export. Insertion or deletion between Phe436 and Ile443-Leu444 as well as Ile443-Leu444 mutation to FF severely disrupted alpha2B-AR transport, indicating there is a defined spatial requirement, which is essential for their function as a single motif regulating receptor transport from the ER. Furthermore, the carboxyl-terminally truncated as well as Phe436 and Ile443-Leu444 mutants were unable to bind ligand and the alpha2B-AR CT conferred its transport properties to the AT1R mutant without the CT in a Phe436-Ile443-Leu444-dependent manner. These data suggest that the Phe436 and Ile443-Leu444 may be involved in both proper folding and export from the ER of the receptor. Similarly, residues Phe309 and Leu316-Leu317 in the CT were identified as essential for AT1R export. The sequence F(X)6LL (where X can be any residue, and L is leucine or isoleucine) is highly conserved in the membrane-proximal CTs of many G protein-coupled receptors and may function as a common motif mediating receptor transport from the ER to the cell surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duvernay et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: