Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants are non-inferior to low molecular weight heparin for secondary prevention of cancer-associated VTE but may increase bleeding rates in certain patient groups.
Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, and treatment strategies are currently evolving beyond traditional low molecular weight heparin.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide safe and effective prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism compared to low molecular weight heparin in cancer patients?
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide safe and effective prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism compared to low molecular weight heparin in cancer patients?
DOACs offer a non-inferior alternative to LMWH for cancer-associated VTE treatment, though with a potentially higher bleeding risk in specific subpopulations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies measurable markers for VTE risk in cancer; leaves open their validation and clinical adoption.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Cancer patients have a four to sevenfold increased risk of VTE compared with non-cancer patients and approximately 20%-30% of all VTE occurs in patients with cancer. Numerous clinical and biologic risk factors predispose cancer patients to VTE, including cancer-directed treatments, tumor site of origin, and circulating mediators produced by tumor cells. Along with clinical risk factors, measurable markers of increased risk such as elevations of the platelet or leukocyte counts, soluble P-selectin, and D-dimer have been integrated to develop numerous risk stratification scores to predict those patients at high risk for cancer-associated VTE. Utilizing risk stratification models, recent studies have examined the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for primary thromboprophylaxis of VTE, with promising results. Treatment of cancer-associated VTE is currently evolving. The long-accepted standard of care, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), is currently being compared with the DOACs in clinical trials. Trials to date using edoxaban and rivaroxaban have found that DOACs are non-inferior to LMWH for the secondary prevention of cancer-associated VTE but may result in an increased rate of bleeding, especially in certain patient groups. Additional studies are ongoing and will be necessary to further define optimal VTE treatment for many cancer patient subpopulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Samkari et al. (2019) conducted a review in Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants are non-inferior to low molecular weight heparin for secondary prevention of cancer-associated VTE but may increase bleeding rates in certain patient groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: