Key result
DOACs significantly reduced the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism compared to VKAs in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer (IRR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84).
Why the study?
Patients with cancer and AF require anticoagulant therapy for stroke and SE prevention, prompting an assessment of stroke/SE and major bleeding rates with DOACs versus VKAs.
Do DOACs reduce the risk of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding compared to VKAs in adult patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer?
Meta-Analysis (n=94,980)
Yes
Do DOACs reduce the risk of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding compared to VKAs in adult patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer?
In patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer, DOACs are associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to VKAs, with a comparable or better safety profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preferring DOACs over VKA in cancer-associated AF; extends observational data but leaves practice change open pending RCTs.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with cancer. Patients with cancer and AF require anticoagulant therapy [direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA)] for stroke and systemic embolism (SE) prevention. We sought to assess the rates of stroke/SE and major bleeding in patients with cancer and AF on oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC or VKA). A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted. The primary efficacy and safety outcome were stroke/SE and major bleeding (as per the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition), respectively. Incidence rates (IR) were pooled using random effects model (event per 100 patient-years). Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were computed using a Poisson regression model with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) using R software (version 4.0.3). Of the total 2,153 article records that were screened, 22 observational studies from 12 different countries were included in the meta-analysis (n = 94,980 patients). The IR of stroke/SE was 1.81 (95% CI: 0.89 to 3.68) and 3.41 (95% CI: 1.38 to 8.41) per 100 patient-years for patients receiving a DOAC and VKA, respectively (IRR: 0.63 (95%CI: 0.47–0.84)). The IR of major bleeding was 2.59 (95%CI: 1.54 to 4.38) and 3.60 (95% CI: 1.68 to 7.71) per 100 patient-years for patients receiving a DOAC and VKA, respectively (IRR: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.55 to 1.04)). DOACs compared to VKA seem to provide a significant reduction in the risk of stroke/SE and a good risk-benefit ratio profile for safety outcomes in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciuffini et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation and cancer (n=94,980). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs. Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) was evaluated on Stroke and systemic embolism (stroke/SE) (IRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.84). DOACs significantly reduced the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism compared to VKAs in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer (IRR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: