In German hospitals, quality measurement, monitoring, and management have undergone considerable development. This includes an array of mandatory measures, including a nationwide benchmarking exercise based on 194 indicators. Because of better and deeper coding of diagnoses, procedures, and demographic information since the introduction of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system, two further "generations" of instruments have been developed: quality measurement performed at the provider (hospital) level using administrative data, and long-term performance measurement using administrative data at the payer level. All three approaches have specific pros and cons concerning validity regarding final outcomes and resistance against manipulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Busse et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: